Back to blog Home
Fundamentals

How We Write at the FitCal Blog: Our Sourcing Method — and Why We Sometimes Say "We Don't Know"

9 August 2026·5 min read
Sources of this article were verified3 scientific references with direct, checkable links

In a world full of health claims, you deserve to know how what you're reading was written — and when you should doubt us.

Our six rules

  1. Every number has a reference: any percentage or statistic in our articles is tied to a published source, with a direct link you can open and verify yourself.
  2. We prefer the highest tiers of evidence: umbrella reviews, then systematic reviews and meta-analyses, then randomised controlled trials, then observational studies. We name the study type so you can weigh it.
  3. We say "we don't know" when we don't: see spot reduction, self-weighing frequency or eggs and cholesterol — three articles that end by saying the evidence conflicts, because it does.
  4. We report a study's limitations: when the sample is small, the duration short, or the funding comes from an interested party, we say so — as in meal replacements.
  5. We separate correlation from causation: an observational study shows an association, not a cause — a distinction that dismantles many popular claims, as in the breakfast myth.
  6. We don't sell you anything inside an article: no supplements, no programmes. When we mention FitCal, we mention it as a logging tool, not a magic fix — in fact we wrote a whole article on the limits of calorie-number accuracy, and we are a calorie app.

What we don't do

How to check us

  1. Open the reference: every article ends with a numbered list of sources and direct links.
  2. Look at the study type: "a meta-analysis of 34 trials" carries far more weight than "a study of 20 people".
  3. Watch effect size, not just significance: "statistically significant" can mean half a kilo in a year — as in green tea.
  4. And write to us if you find an error — we will correct it and thank you.

Why all this?

Because Arabic health content is full of numbers without sources and promises without evidence. And because we are building an app that asks people to trust it with their bodies — and trust begins with telling you the truth even when it doesn't serve us.

🗂️ Start here: If you're new to the blog, the ten-step roadmap is the best entry point. And if you're starting from absolute zero, the thirty-day plan suits you better.

Scientific references

  1. Frankenfield D et al. — an example of a systematic review as the highest evidence tier (J Am Diet Assoc) — https://www.jandonline.org/article/S0002-8223(05)00149-5/abstract
  2. Singh B et al. — an example of an umbrella review (British Journal of Sports Medicine) — https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36796860/
  3. Hall KD et al. — an example of a randomised controlled trial in a controlled environment (Cell Metabolism) — https://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131(19)30248-7

Snap your meal — we handle the rest

The first calorie app that knows kabsa, muhammar and jareesh by name — with 3D portion estimation and an Arabic-speaking coach.

Reserve your spot in the first batch 🚀
Back to all articles

Medical & legal disclaimer: Content on the FitCal blog is general education and awareness. It is not medical advice, a diagnosis, or a treatment plan, and it does not replace consulting a licensed healthcare practitioner who knows your case. Do not start or stop any medication, supplement, diet or training programme based on what you read here. Any mention of a drug, supplement or product is educational reporting of the scientific literature — not an advertisement or endorsement — and any doses cited are those used in the studies, not personal recommendations. Every figure is sourced at the bottom of each article so you can verify it yourself; if you spot an error, email us at fitcal@verokron.com and we will review and correct it. In Saudi Arabia, for health advice call 937; in an emergency call 997.