"I train and then eat more, so what's the point" — a common excuse, and the evidence dismantles it into one correct half and one entirely wrong half.
What happens physiologically?
Appetite and hunger are suppressed after exercise, particularly in the immediate post-exercise state — a phenomenon called "exercise-induced anorexia", attributed to suppression of hunger hormones such as ghrelin and increases in satiety hormones like peptide YY and GLP-1[1]. Intense exercise specifically tends to suppress appetite with reduced ghrelin[2].
And actual eating?
The evidence varies but leans clearly: only 19% of intervention studies reported an increase in energy intake after exercise, while 65% reported no change[2].
after exercise
increase
more than hormones
So where is the real problem?
In your head, not your stomach. Compensation has more to do with our thoughts than with our hormones: when a person experiences exercise as unenjoyable or hard, they become more likely to eat more or choose unhealthy food afterwards — a phenomenon known as "post-exercise licensing"[3].
Research has also observed that healthy snack choice is reduced in the post-exercise state[4] — meaning the issue isn't quantity but quality and decision-making.
And note the full loop
If you eat against your watch's number, the problem is doubled — because that number may be overstated by about 28% (the article).
How to break the "licence"
- Choose exercise you enjoy: not a detail — it is the variable that predicts compensation.
- Plan your post-workout meal in advance — don't decide while tired.
- Don't link food to reward: reward yourself with something non-edible.
- Drink water first: post-exercise thirst is often read as hunger (the evidence).
- Log the meal: awareness alone stops the "licence" before it is spent.